Home >> News >> 2010 >> May >> PLANS FOR MEMORIAL SLAMMED - Tempers flare over ‘triumphant’ bid for RAF monument in Green Park
PLANS FOR MEMORIAL SLAMMED - Tempers flare over ‘triumphant’ bid for RAF monument in Green Park
Published: 7 May, 2010
by JAMIE WELHAM
THE group masterminding plans to build a memorial to thousands of airmen who lost their lives in the Second World War has been accused of unleashing a wave of “triumphalism” to see it pushed through.
The Thorney Island Society, the prestigious neighbourhood group that counts musician Jools Holland as a patron and opposes putting the memorial in Green Park, has also criticised the RAF-backed Bomber Command Association (BCA) for its “inappropriate” use of images of bomb scorched Germany.
It says the £3million monument close to Hyde Park Corner, which stretches more than 80 metres, would threaten the peace of the park and bring about an irreversible loss of open space.
Planning chiefs from Westminster Council will decide its fate at a crunch committee meeting on Thursday.
Included in the application literature submitted to the council are photographs showing the destruction wrought by bombers during raids on dockyards in Hamburg in 1943.
TOM Ball, committee member of the Thorney Island Society, said: “To reproduce such pictures showing the destruction of Germany 65 years after the cessation of hostilities is disturbing when we are now united with them... It is emotive and inappropriate.”
He stressed that the St James’s-based society was not against a memorial “per se” but that Green Park is the wrong location.
Mr Ball’s words were branded “disgraceful” by the secretary of the BCA and former gunner Douglas Radcliffe MBE.
The memorial for the 55,573 bomber airmen who died during the war has a list of high profile supporters, including both Gordon Brown and David Cameron, Lord Ashcroft, who has helped finance the project and the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which led a fundraising campaign.
Last week Mr Cameron said it was high time the country showed its gratitude by building a permanent memorial to the “brave men”.
Mr Ball added: “To produce an enormous architectural feature which destroys physically part of Green Park, with a lasting structure which would change that part of the park for ever, shows an insensitivity which is without feeling and is outrageous.
“The parkland is unique as a Royal Park. Ironically it survived the horrors of war only to be threatened by the incursions of a ‘memorial’ to those who lost their lives in part to save England’s traditions.”
His opposition was echoed by Juliet Lyle, a fellow member of the society and Green Party candidate for St James’s ward who is collecting a petition ahead of the hearing, which if successful would see work completed by the end of next year.
Ms Lyle said: “It has an air of triumphalism about it. We are definitely not unsympathetic to the cause, but I think using these sort of emotive and disturbing images is below the belt.
“Green park is not the right location for this. We should guard our environment and especially this quiet, peaceful corner of the park.”
Mr Radcliffe said: “I think it is quite disgraceful that we should be accused of triumphalism for trying to honour the people who gave up their lives for their country. My rear gunner and pilot are buried in Germany. Are they suggesting they don’t deserve a monument?
“It is in the hands of Westminster Council. But actually I think that part of Green Park needs something anyway. It’s not the best part of the park and is a good location given there is already a First World War memorial around the corner.”
The monument features quotations from Winston Churchill and a bronze statue of an air crew within a line of stone columns. Bomber Command was formed by the RAF in 1936 to fly raids at night.
Comments
Bonber Command Memorial
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 2010-09-14 20:41.The design is a big disappointment as feared .... it looks like the screen at Hyde Park Corner. It's too long and doesn't have much to do with Bomber Command.
Memorials are hard. There have been some very poor ones recently. They should have looked to the Royal Artillery monument for guidance .... or just cast a Lancasre nose in Bronze. A real monument has been flying for years with the BoB flight.
The Green Park must not be a site for Bomber Command memorial
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2010-06-04 10:43.A battle of wills and emotions - Bomber Command memorial in The Green Park
We see that the proposal for a memorial is contentious, clouded by conflicting interests, yet where few if any are opposed to the notion of a memorial to the airmen who died in the cause of defending freedom.
On the one hand there is the unique ‘countryside in the city’ (The Green Park), and on the other, there is the determination to take over a piece of that countryside to build Bomber Command Association’s huge structure. One is intent on maintaining a centuries old decision to keep an area green, as woodland and undulating ‘natural’ countryside. The other sees it as an opportunity to impose their will on a piece of open ground. If the first succeeds in preventing the take over, the parkland remains for this and future generations. If the second prevails, it has overridden and destroyed the essential bequest of open space for the citizens of London
Surely the sense of the argument is very clear. The Green Park open space is established and immovable - there is no alternative: it cannot move. On the other hand, the memorial structure could be located in a number of different appropriate sites. There is absolutely no essential reason for it to be constructed in The Green Park, with irrevocable loss.
The conclusion is that there is no fundamental necessity for the Bomber Command memorial to be built in The Green Park; nor in the huge form that is proposed. Therefore, we the undersigned urge that those responsible, withdraw from The Green Park and seek an alternative site. We also suggest that the memorial to the Bomber Command airmen, takes a more appropriate form
The destruction of The Green Park must not be allowed
Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2010-06-04 10:41.A battle of wills and emotions - Bomber Command memorial in The Green Park
We see that the proposal for a memorial is contentious, clouded by conflicting interests, yet where few if any are opposed to the notion of a memorial to the airmen who died in the cause of defending freedom.
On the one hand there is the unique ‘countryside in the city’ (The Green Park), and on the other, there is the determination to take over a piece of that countryside to build Bomber Command Association’s huge structure. One is intent on maintaining a centuries old decision to keep an area green, as woodland and undulating ‘natural’ countryside. The other sees it as an opportunity to impose their will on a piece of open ground. If the first succeeds in preventing the take over, the parkland remains for this and future generations. If the second prevails, it has overridden and destroyed the essential bequest of open space for the citizens of London
Surely the sense of the argument is very clear. The Green Park open space is established and immovable - there is no alternative: it cannot move. On the other hand, the memorial structure could be located in a number of different appropriate sites. There is absolutely no essential reason for it to be constructed in The Green Park, with irrevocable loss.
The conclusion is that there is no fundamental necessity for the Bomber Command memorial to be built in The Green Park; nor in the huge form that is proposed. Therefore, we the undersigned urge that those responsible, withdraw from The Green Park and seek an alternative site. We also suggest that the memorial to the Bomber Command airmen, takes a more appropriate form
Tom Ball Member of the Thorney Island Society, Architect and Planner
10 Paxton Terrace London SW1V 3DA
Bonber Command Memorial
Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 2010-05-17 15:33.Westminster City Council planning sub-committe, aginst the advice of their own planning officers decided on 13 May to approve the design for this memorial. I am not against having a memorial but one of this dimension and pretentious design is more suitable to Berlin in the '30's than one of our lovliest Royal Parks. I have yet to hear why the designers did not design a memorial which could be constructed within the £1.5 Million collected.
There is in place a government moratorium on memorials in the Royal Parks. Let us hope the new Minister will insist this moratorium remains in place and that he suggests to the BCA they ask their designers to have a rethink and produce a design that is not only relevant to the site but is also modest in massing,scale and most importantly of all cost.
Ivor Hall
Post new comment