Hands off tenants and their housing benefits

Published: 16 July, 2010

Open letter to Nick Clegg and David Cameron

• CUTS in housing benefit set out in the Budget will make the poorest pay for the housing crisis.

Unaffordable housing costs are the problem not the level of housing benefit.

We call on the government to withdraw these proposals and increase the supply of council and other secure affordable rented homes.

Punitive cuts in housing benefit set out in the June “emergency” Budget will hit council, housing association and other private sector tenants, destabilise settled communities and enforce social exclusion, creating no-go areas
for tenants across Britain.

The National Housing Federation warn of thousands facing eviction, and homelessness could rise by over 200,000.

Government plans to reduce housing benefit by 10 per cent for jobseekers who have been out of work for more than 12 months means that from April 2013 unemployed people will have to make up the shortfall from their £65 Jobseekers’ Allowance. 

People should not be forced to leave their homes and communities.

In a period of rising unemployment with growing housing waiting lists, overcrowding and homelessness where are the jobs or homes to move to?

Government also warned it will seek to reduce housing benefits to council and other tenants of working age who are thought to be overhoused. 

Work and Pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith has spoken of “tons of elderly people” who should be encouraged to move out of their family homes.

Average housing benefit is under £84 a week.

Local housing allowance already fails to cover the housing costs of over half of all claimants who have to make up an average of £100 a month.

Even housing association and council rents are in danger of becoming unaffordable for those in low-paid work.

High housing costs, too high for people in work, are why housing benefit is needed.

The shortage of suitable affordable homes, and policies designed to keep housing costs high, are to blame for high housing benefit bills

We call on this government to:

  • withdraw these proposals and consult tenants about housing benefit reform;
  • boost public house building programmes;
  • increase protection to all tenants through rent regulation and secure tenancies.

JOHN ROLFE
chair Camden Federation of Tenants and Residents’ Associations
Q BRADLEY
on behalf of Leeds Tenants’ Federation

Comments

D.C. TERRIFIED TO SEND CHILD TO STATE SCHOOL

Dear Editor,

When my kids went to school back in the late 80's, I wasn't terrified but I was extremely worried that we had chosen the right school for them. Nobody knows how their children will turn out academically and if they go on to a good secondary school enabling them to get to the university which most of us want, then it is large plus. If I had had the money at that time I would have no hesitation in sending my children to private school and a lot of ordinary people would as well.

I believe that Karen Buck had a problem with her child attending a school a few years ago which was documented by your paper and also Diane Abbott, Labour MP (and labour leader candidate) sends her child to a private school.

One must not forget also that people in the political world and elsewhere can afford private tutors etc to enhance the child's ability in possibly weaker subject(s). Therefore, we will never eradicate the class system that still exists in the UK and that is reflected by the amount of MP's who have gone to university and made a career out of politics because it is all based on how well off you are.

One thing that strikes me most is that you can go to further education and get a degree, but whether that engenders common sense seems to be an issue that induces a temporary lapse of reason on some of the major decisions made by politicians, the judiciary and other agencies in institutions of power.

James Quinn

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.